Definition of normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal knee alignment for total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: One of the most pertinent questions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is: what could be considered normal coronal alignment? This study aims to define normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal alignment using large data from a computed tomography (CT)-scan database and previously published phenotypes. METHODS: Coronal alignment parameters from 11,191 knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients were measured based on three dimensional reconstructed CT data using a validated planning software. Based on these measurements, patients' coronal alignment was phenotyped according to the functional knee phenotype concept. These phenotypes represent an alignment variation of the overall hip knee ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). Each phenotype is defined by a specific mean and covers a range of ±1.5° from this mean. Coronal alignment is classified as normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant based on distribution frequency. Mean values and distribution among the phenotypes are presented and compared between two populations (OA patients in this study and non-OA patients from a previously published study). RESULTS: The arithmetic HKA (aHKA), combined normalised data of FMA and TMA, showed that 36.0% of knees were neutral within ±1 SD from the mean in both angles, 44.3% had either a TMA or a FMA within ±1-2 SD (normally aligned), 15.3% of the patients were deviant within ±2-3 SD and only 4.4% of them had an aberrant alignment (±3-4 SD in 3.4% and >4 SD in 1.0% of the patients respectively). However, combining the normalised data of HKA, FMA and TMA, 15.4% of patients were neutral in all three angles, 39.7% were at least normal, 27.7% had at least one deviant angle and 17.2% had at least one aberrant angle. For HKA, the males exhibited 1° varus and females were neutral. For FMA, the females exhibited 0.7° more valgus in mean than males and grew 1.8° per category (males grew 2.1° per category). For TMA, the males exhibited 1.3° more varus than females and both grew 2.3° and 2.4° (females) per category. Normal coronal alignment was 179.2° ± 2.8-5.6° (males) and 180.5 > ± 2.8-5.6° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 2.1-4.2° (males) and 93.8 > ± 1.8-3.6° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 2.3-4.6° (males) and 88 > ± 2.4-4.8° (females) for TMA. This means HKA 6.4 varus or 4.8° valgus (males) or 5.1° varus to 6.1° valgus was considered normal. For FMA HKA 1.1 varus or 7.3° valgus (males) or 0.2° valgus to 7.4° valgus was considered normal. For TMA HKA 7.9 varus or 1.3° valgus (males) or 6.8° varus to 2.8° valgus was considered normal. Aberrant coronal alignment started from 179.2° ± 8.4° (males) and 180.5 > ± 8.4° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 6.3° (males) 93.8 > ± 5.4° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 6.9° (males) and 88 > ± 7.2° (females) for TMA. This means HKA > 9.2° varus or 7.6° valgus (males) or 7.9° varus to 8.9° valgus was considered aberrant. CONCLUSION: Definitions of neutrality, normality, deviance as well as aberrance for coronal alignment in TKA were proposed in this study according to their distribution frequencies. This can be seen as an important first step towards a safe transition from the conventional one-size-fits-all to a more personalised coronal alignment target. There should be further definitions combining bony alignment, joint surfaces' morphology, soft tissue laxities and joint kinematics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Which method for femoral component sizing when performing kinematic alignment TKA? An in silico study.

INTRODUCTION: The kinematically alignment (KA) technique for TKA aims to reproduce the pre-arthritic knee anatomy, including both the femoro-tibial and femoro-patellar joints. An in silico study was conducted to compare 3 different femoral component sizing techniques to identify the anatomical landmark which allows closest restoration of the native trochlear anatomy. Our study's question was: what was the best method for sizing the femoral component when performing KA-TKA? It was hypothesized that sizing the femoral component by aiming to restore the groove height would be the best method to restore the native trochlear anatomy. METHODS: GMK sphere® (Medacta) femoral component 3D models were virtually kinematically aligned on 30 tri-dimensional (3D) bony osteoarthritis knee models. The femoral component was mediolaterally positioned to match distal native and prosthetic grooves. Three methods were used to size the femoral component: a conventional method with the anterior femoral cut flush to the femoral cortex (C-KATKA) and two alternative personalized methods aiming to recreate either the medial facet's height (ATM-KATKA) or the groove's height (ATG-KATKA). In-house analysis software was used to compare native and prosthetic trochlear articular surfaces and mediolateral implant overhangs. RESULTS: Compared with the C-KATKA, ATG-KATKA and ATM-KATKA techniques increased the component size by a mean of 0.90 (SD 0.31, min 0.5 to max 1.5) (p<0.001) and 1.02 (SD 0.31, min 0.5 to max 1.5) (p<0.001), respectively. C-KATKA technique substantially proximally understuffed the trochleae with maximum values of 7.11mm (SD 1.39, min 3.93mm to max 10.57mm) in the medial facet, 4.72mm (SD 1.27, min 1.46mm to max 6.86mm) in the lateral facet and 4.51mm (SD 1.40, min 1.92mm to max 7.30mm) in the groove, respectively. Alternative techniques understuffed medial facet with maximum values of 5.07mm (SD 1.29, min 2.83mm to max 8.34mm) and 4.70mm (SD 1.52, min 0.83mm to max 8.04mm) for ATG-KATKA and ATM-KATKA techniques, respectively. There was no significant understuffing of the groove or lateral facet for alternative techniques (ATM and ATG). The ATM-KATKA and ATG-KATKA techniques generated mediolateral implant overhang, mainly postero-lateral, with a rate of 90.0% and 86.7%, respectively. In this study, no mediolateral implant overhang was found for C-KATKA. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The C-KATKA technique substantially understuffs the native trochlear articular surfaces in medial, lateral and groove parts. Alternative techniques (ATM-KATKA and ATG-KATKA) for sizing the femoral component better restore the native trochlear anatomy but also generate a high rate of postero-lateral implant overhangs. Would this postero-lateral implant overhang be clinically deleterious remains unknown? The aspect ratio of contemporary femoral TKA implants can probably be optimized to allow a better anatomical restoration of the anterior femoral compartment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, in silico study.

Why personalized surgery is the future of hip and knee arthroplasty: a statement from the Personalized Arthroplasty Society.

Although hip and knee joint replacements provide excellent clinical results, many patients still do not report the sensation and function of a natural joint. The perception that the joint is artificial may result from the anatomical modifications imposed by the surgical technique and the implant design. Moreover, the joint replacement material may not function similarly to human tissues. To restore native joint kinematics, function, and perception, three key elements play a role: (i) joint morphology (articular surface geometry, bony anatomy, etc.), (ii) lower limb anatomy (alignment, joint orientation), and (iii) soft tissue laxity/tension. To provide a 'forgotten joint' to most patients, it is becoming clear that personalizing joint replacement is the key solution. Performing a personalized joint replacement starts with patient selection and preoperative optimization, followed by using a surgical technique and implant design aimed at restoring the patient's native anatomy, creating optimal implant-to-bone stress transfer, restoring the joint's native articular range of motion without imposed limitations, macro- and micro-stability of the soft tissues, and a bearing whose wear resistance provides lifetime survivorship with unrestricted activities. In addition, the whole perioperative experience should follow enhanced recovery after surgery principles, favoring a rapid and complication-free recovery. As a new concept, some confusion may arise when applying these personalized surgery principles. Therefore, the Personalized Arthroplasty Society was created to help structure and accelerate the adoption of this paradigm change. This statement from the Society on personalized arthroplasty will serve as a reference that will evolve with time.

Evolution of Concepts: Can Personalized Hip Arthroplasty Improve Joint Stability?

Hip arthroplasty procedures are successful and reproducible. However, within the first two post-operative years, hip dislocations are the most common cause for revisions. This is despite the majority of the dislocations having the acetabular component within what is described as the 'safe zone'. The limitations of such boundaries do not take into account the variability of individual hip anatomy and functional pelvic orientation that exist. An alternative concept to address hip instability and improve overall outcomes is functional acetabular orientation. In this review article, we discuss the evolution of concepts, particularly the kinematic alignment technique for hip arthroplasty and the use of large-diameter heads to understand why total hip arthroplasty dislocations occur and how to prevent them.

Limb alignment changes with knee flexion: A study based on CAS data.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has questioned the value of standing limb alignment for predicting the adduction moment and forces exerted on healthy and prosthetic knees. The purpose of this study was to assess the lower limb alignment of OA knee patients at various knee flexion angles. The main hypothesis was that lower limb alignment measured throughout knee flexion does not significantly differ between patients displaying different extension alignment (neutral, varus or valgus). METHODS: 206 arthritic knee patients undergoing computer-assisted total (CAS) knee prosthesis were included. Frontal limb alignment was assessed in a systematic manner by CAS at three knee positions: extension, 90 degrees of flexion and maximal flexion. The HKA angle at each knee position and the change in HKA angle between two knee positions (delta value) were reported and compared. RESULTS: A large proportion of OA patients had significant variation in their lower limb alignment (32% with Δ HKA > 5°). The extended limb deformity tended to reduce with knee flexion: mean of 5° and 6° deformity reduction for varus and valgus patients, 40% and 66% of varus and valgus patients progressed to neutral alignment with 90° knee flexion. Forty percent of neutral extended lower limb did not maintain their neutral alignment but rather progressed to either varus or valgus at 90° knee flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Limb alignment in extension is a poor predictor of limb alignment in flexion in OA patients. Only considering the traditional frontal alignment of an extended lower limb for planning knee arthroplasty or osteotomy is likely insufficient.

Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rationale, Targets, Accuracy, Balancing, Implant Survival, and Outcomes.

Peer-reviewed studies published up to May 2022 are used to provide a comprehensive understanding of unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. The intent is to cultivate the curiosity of those interested in this method of personalized alignment. The rationale of unrestricted kinematic alignment is to set the femoral and tibial components coincident with the patient's prearthritic joint lines, restore the femoral and tibial phenotypes, and coalign the three kinematic axes of the components with those of the knee. The surgical technique, learning curve, and accuracy of performing kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with a caliper and company manufactured manual instrumentation should be explored and compared with robotic instrumentation. Kinematic alignment restores the native knee's medial and lateral tibial compartment forces, which mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty cannot do even after ligament release. In addition, insert conformity plays a role in restoring native tibiofemoral kinematics. A literature review of clinical outcomes, long-term durability, and the risk of varus tibial component failure and patellofemoral instability shows unrestricted kinematic alignment has comparable if not superior results when compared with mechanical alignment.

The significant relationship among the factors of pelvic incidence, standing lumbar lordosis, and lumbar flexibility in Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: A descriptive radiographic study.

INTRODUCTION: Spine stiffness is known to increase the risk of total hip replacement (THR) instability. The sagittal posture and lumbo-pelvic kinematics have therefore become parameters of interest when planning THR. We conducted this study to investigate (1) the distribution and characteristics of the spino-pelvic standing alignment, (2) the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and standing lumbar lordosis (LL) and lumbar flexibility, in Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients. HYPOTHESIS: (1) Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients with different sagittal spino-pelvic alignments do not differ markedly in their demographics, PI, or lumbar flexibility; and (2) there is no significant relationship between PI, standing LL, and lumbar flexibility in a population of Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of radiographs from 945 Japanese patients who consecutively received THR for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. All patients pre-operatively underwent lateral standing and deep-seated lumbo-pelvic radiography on which the spino-pelvic parameters were measured. The difference between the standing and deep-seated LL angles defined the lumbar flexibility and was calculated as the delta (Δ) LL. Individual spino-pelvic standing alignment was stratified based on the difference between the PI and standing LL ('PI-LL mismatch'). 'PI-LL mismatch' of<-10°, between -10° and 10°, and>10° was defined as hyperlordosis, normolordosis, and flatback, respectively. RESULTS: In the present study, the spinal alignment of 115/945 (12.2%), 559/945 (59.2%), and 271/945 (28.6%) patients were classified as hyperlordosis, normolordosis, and flatback, respectively. Hyperlordotic patients had significantly lower PI (47.6°±7.8° vs. 52.7°±10.5°, p<0.001) and higher ΔLL (60.6°±12.6° vs. 51.6°±12.8°, p<0.001) than normolordotic patients. Patients with flatback were significantly older (age, 69.1±9.1 years vs. 62.7±9.8 years, p<0.001) with higher PI (56.9°±11.7° vs. 52.7°±10.5°, p<0.001) and lower ΔLL (35.2°±17.4° vs. 51.6°±12.8°, p<0.001) than normolordotic patients. A significant relationship between PI and the standing LL was found in the whole cohort (r=0.409, p=0.009), hyperlordotic (r=0.785, p<0.001), normolordotic (r=0.857, p<0.001), and flatback (r=0.664, p<0.001) patients. Significant relationships between the PI and ΔLL were also found in normolordotic (r=0.442, p=0.004) and flatback (r=0.449, p=0.003) patients but not hyperlordotic patients (r=0.154, p=0.367). DISCUSSION: A large proportion of Japanese hip osteoarthritis patients have abnormal PI-LL mismatch (12% and 29% have hyperlordosis and flatback, respectively). The PI was a determinant of the standing LL and the lumbar flexibility, especially in the normolordotic and flatback individuals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective diagnostic radiographic study.

The medial condylar wall is a reliable landmark to kinematically align the femoral component in medial UKA: an in-silico study.

PURPOSE: Kinematic alignment (KA) aligns the femoral implant perpendicular to the cylindrical axis in the frontal and axial plane. Identification of the kinematic axes when using the mini-invasive sub-quadricipital approach is challenging in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aims to assess if the orientation of condylar walls may be suitable for use as an anatomical landmark to kinematically align the femoral component in medial UKA. It was hypothesised that the medial wall of the medial condyle would prove to be a reliable anatomical landmark to set both the frontal and axial alignment of the femoral component in medial UKA. METHODS: 73 patients undergoing medial UKA had pre-operative CT imaging to generate 3D models. Those with osteophytes that impaired visualisation of the condylar walls were excluded. 28 patients were included in the study. The ideal KA was determined using the cylindrical axis in the frontal and axial plane. Simulations using the medial wall of the medial condyle (MWMC) and the lateral wall of the medial condyle (LWMC) were performed to set the frontal alignment. To set the axial alignment, the MWMC, LWMC, medial wall of the lateral condyle (MWLC), and medial diagonal line (MDL) anatomical landmarks were investigated. Differences between the ideal measured KA values and values obtained using landmarks were investigated. RESULTS: Use of the MWMC let to similar frontal alignment compared to the ideal KA (2.9° valgus vs 3.4° valgus, p = 0.371) with 46.4% (13/28) of measurements being [Formula: see text] 1.0° different from the ideal KA and only 1 simulation with greater than 4.0° difference. Use of the MWMC led to very similar axial alignments compared to the ideal KA (0.5° internal vs 0.0°, p = 0.960) with 75.0% (21/28) of measurements being [Formula: see text] 1.0o different from the ideal KA, and a maximum difference of 3.0°. Use of the MWLC and MDL was associated with significant statistical differences when compared to the ideal KA (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: The native orientation of the medial condylar wall seems to be a reliable anatomical landmark for aligning the femoral component in medial KA UKA in both the axial plane and frontal planes. Other assessed landmarks were shown to not be reliable. Clinical and radiographic assessments of the reliability of using the MWMC to set the frontal and axial orientation of the femoral component when performing a medial KA UKA are needed.

Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Owing to the improved understanding of knee kinematics and the successful introduction of the kinematic alignment (KA) technique for implanting total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it was recently understood that the "Cartier angle technique" corresponds to a kinematic implantation of the uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) components. When compared to the universally spread mechanical alignment (MA) technique for implanting UKA, the KA method generates a more anatomic prosthetic knee that may be clinically advantageous. The aims of this study are to determine if KA UKAs are associated with acceptable functional performance and patient satisfaction (question 1), rates of residual pain and tibia plateau fracture (question 2), and rates of reoperation and revision (question 3), and to define the component orientation and limb alignment as measured on radiograph (question 4), and the stress shielding related bone loss in the proximal tibia (question 5) with KA UKA, and where possible to compare with MA UKA. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: KA UKA generates good clinical outcomes, similar or superior to the ones of MA UKA. METHOD: Systematic review of literature databases were primarily searched using Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS). Two primary searches were conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed, and a secondary search was conducted using review articles and bibliography of obtained papers in order to ascertain more material. RESULTS: Nine eligible non-comparative prospective (3) or retrospective (6) cohort studies, which cumulated 593 KA UKAs with follow-up between 3.2 and 12 years, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The findings demonstrated high Knee Society Score (KSS) (from 87 to 95) and function scores (from 81 to above 91) in addition to patient satisfaction scores of 88%. There was no revision for tibia plateau fracture, 0.8% (5 cases) for unexplained pain tibia, 2.0% (12 cases) for component loosening, and 5.6% (33 cases) for any causes of aseptic failures reported for KA UKA. The prosthetic lower limb and tibia implant alignments were both found to be in slight varus (means between 3 and 5°), and the postoperative joint line and tibia component was shown to be parallel to the floor when standing. The KA UKA components migration, as measured on radiostereometry, was acceptable. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The KA technique is an alternative, personalised, more physiological method for implanting UKA, which could be clinically advantageous when compared to the MA technique. The literature supports the good mid- to long-term clinical safety and good efficacy of KA UKA; however, comparison between KA and MA techniques for UKA was not performed due to limited literature. Further investigations are needed to better define the clinical impact of KA UKA, and the acceptable limits for KA of the UKA tibial component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4; systematic review of level 4 studies.

Moderate relationship between function and satisfaction of total hip arthroplasty patients: a cross sectional study.

PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction regarding their hip replacement is often assumed to be directly linked to functional outcomes. We led this study to answer 2 questions: (1) what is the level of patient satisfaction, function, and quality of life after primary total hip replacement (THR); and (2) what is the relationship between patient satisfaction and functional and quality of life PROMs after THR? METHODS: We led a retrospective study using our institutional registry of prospectively and consecutively collected data on patients after primary THR undertaken between 2004 and 2017. We included 6710 patients with a complete 2-year set of follow-up data for Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (for assessing patient's function), EQ-5D (for assessing patient's quality of life) and satisfaction PROM scores. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in all OHS and EQ-5D scores from preoperative level, and the mean postoperative satisfaction score was 89/100. We found moderate positive correlations between the patients' outcome satisfaction VAS score and OHS (r = 0.665) and EQ-5D (r = 0.554). CONCLUSIONS: THR is a successful procedure generating high levels of patient function and satisfaction. Because patients' OHS and EQ-5D scores may be influenced by comorbidities, those scores are of poor predictive value in estimating patient satisfaction, and therefore should not be used as a surrogate to determine the success of the THR procedure.

Specific case consideration for implanting TKA with the Kinematic Alignment technique.

The Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative surgical technique aiming to resurface knee articular surfaces.The restricted KA (rKA) technique for TKA applies boundaries to the KA technique in order to avoid reproducing extreme constitutional limb/knee anatomies.The vast majority of TKA cases are straightforward and can be performed with KA in a standard (unrestricted) fashion.There are some specific situations where performing KA TKA may be more challenging (complex KA TKA cases) and surgical technique adaptations should be included.To secure good clinical outcomes, complex KA TKA cases must be preoperatively recognized, and planned accordingly.The proposed classification system describes six specific issues that must be considered when aiming for a KA TKA implantation.Specific recommendations for each situation type should improve the reliability of the prosthetic implantation to the benefit of the patient.The proposed classification system could contribute to the adoption of a common language within our orthopaedic community that would ease inter-surgeon communication and could benefit the teaching of the KA technique. This proposed classification system is not exhaustive and will certainly be improved over time. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:881-891. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210042.

The relationship between pelvic incidence and anatomical acetabular anteversion in female Japanese patients with hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective iconographic study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed (1) to investigate the relationship between pelvic incidence (PI) and the anatomical acetabular anteversion (AA) relative to the spino-pelvic tilt (SPT) plane (anatomical AASPT), relative to the anterior pelvic plane (anatomical AAAPP), and functional standing AA; and (2) to compare AA and the sagittal spino-pelvic parameters of lumbo-pelvic complex types 1 (PI ≤ 30°) and 2 (PI > 30°), in Japanese females with hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 110 Japanese females with unilateral hip osteoarthritis. PI, standing lumbar lordosis (LL), standing SPT, anatomical AASPT, anatomical AAAPP, and functional standing AA were measured and calculated using radiographs and computed tomography. The PI-LL difference was defined as the mathematical difference between the PI and standing LL angles. Pearson's correlation test was used to measure the relationship between the PI and AA. Student's t test was used to compare spino-pelvic parameters between lumbo-pelvic complex type 1 (n = 24) and type 2 (n = 86). RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between the PI and anatomical AASPT (r = -0.532, p < 0.001), but no significant relationship between the PI and anatomical AAAPP (r = -0.021, p = 0.824) or functional standing AA (r = 0.104, p = 0.299). Lumbo-pelvic complex type 1 had a higher anatomical AASPT (22.4° ± 9.1° vs. 5.4° ± 15.1°, p < 0.001), similar anatomical AAAPP (15.0° ± 10.6° vs. 15.1° ± 15.3°, p = 0.981) and functional standing AA (12.4° ± 8.0° vs. 15.0° ± 14.1°, p = 0.254), a lower standing SPT (- 14.3° ± 11.0° vs. 13.7° ± 12.6°, p < 0.001), and a lower PI-LL difference (- 14.4° ± 18.5° vs. 6.4° ± 17.1°, p < 0.001) in comparison to lumbo-pelvic complex type 2. CONCLUSION: Our findings will help to improve the understanding of hip anatomy and its relationship with the standing spino-pelvic alignment in Japanese females with hip osteoarthritis.

Disappointing Relationship between Functional Performance and Patient Satisfaction of UKA Patients: A Cross Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Following a Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) satisfaction is often conflated with functional outcome. Recent studies have shown that satisfaction is not linked to functional outcome. The research questions were: (1) what is the relationship between satisfaction and functional performance and quality of life (absolute and gain values) after UKA? And (2) what is the level of satisfaction, function, and quality of life after UKA? HYPOTHESIS: There is a poor relationship between functional performance and patient satisfaction following UKA. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using a locally held arthroplasty register to identify patients who had undergone UKA between 2004 and 2017. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively and included EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction score (based on a visual analogue score with 0 being worst and 100 being best). Patients with a complete set of pre-operative and 2-year post-operative outcome scores were included. Patients who subsequently underwent revision surgery were excluded. 1638 patients were identified, of which 896 were eligible for inclusion. The average age was 66.7 years old, with 46.3% of patients being female. RESULTS: There was a moderate to strong correlation between the absolute or relative values for OKS and the patient satisfaction following UKA (r=0.705 and r=0.522, respectively). The average pre-operative scores improved from a median of 23 (IQR 18-28) to 43 (IQR 35-46) (p<0.001) and from a median of 0.62 (IQR 0.186-0.691) to 0.85 (IQR 0.691 - 1) (p<0.001) for OKS and EQ-5D, respectively. In terms of satisfaction with outcome, 82.6% of patients were very satisfied and 4.4% were dissatisfied (scoring ≥80% and <50%, respectively). At 2 years, the PASS was met or surpassed by 73.1% and 54.9% (OKS and EQ-5D, respectively). The MCID was met or surpassed by 93% and 78% (OKS and EQ-5D, respectively). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: UKA is a successful procedure generating high levels of patient function and satisfaction. Because patients' OKS and EQ-5D scores may be influenced by comorbidities, those scores are of disappointing predictive value in estimating patient satisfaction, and therefore should not be used as a surrogate to determine the success of the UKA procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Restrospective cohort study.

Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5d poorly predict patient's satisfaction following mechanically aligned total knee replacement: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is increasingly used to measure the success of arthroplasty. Satisfaction with the outcome of a total knee replacement (TKR) is traditionally thought to be associated with improvements in functional status and quality of life measures. This study aims to answer the following questions: 1. What is the level of patient satisfaction, improvement in knee function and patient quality of life associated with mechanically aligned TKR? 2. What is the relationship between OKS, EQ-5d scores and 'outcome satisfaction'? HYPOTHESIS: TKR is associated with a significant improvement in function, satisfaction and quality of life and that there is a strong correlation between OKS, EQ-5d and 'outcome satisfaction'. METHOD: Five thousand eight hundred and ninety six patients underwent primary TKR between January 2010 and December 2017 and had complete preoperative and 2-year follow-up data for OKS, EQ-5d and satisfaction scores. Outcomes data were collected prospectively and recorded on our institutional database. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the Patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for OKS and EQ-5d, the association between OKS, EQ-5d and 'outcome satisfaction' was measured using regression analysis. RESULTS: The median 2-year 'outcome satisfaction' score was 90/100 with 79% of patients reporting excellent satisfaction (≥80/100) and 93.4% of patients satisfied (≥50/100). Postoperatively, median scores were 39 for OKS and 0.8 for EQ-5d. The mean increase in scores was 15.85 for OKS and 0.32 for EQ-5d. Satisfaction showed moderate positive correlation with postoperative OKS (r=0.69) and EQ-5D (0.58) scores, but weaker correlation with the change in OKS (r=0.57) and EQ-5d (r=0.32) scores from preoperative levels. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Mechanically aligned TKR is overall a successful operation responsible of fair rate of patient satisfaction. OKS and EQ-5d are imperfect predictors for satisfaction as they are significantly influenced by patients' comorbidities. This should be taken into account when evaluating the success of an operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIc; observational study (based on prospectively collected data from an institutional registry).